All Issue

2021 Vol.21

Research Article

Recent Agenda of UNESCO Creative Cities Network (UCCN) and Alternative Urban Cultural Policy Discourse

유네스코 창의도시 네트워크(UCCN)의 의제분석과 도시의 문화정책방향

남기범

Keebom Nahm

서울시립대학교 도시사회학과 교수
Professor, Dept. of Urban Sociology, University of Seoul
30 April 2021. pp. 7-39
PDF Citation
Abstract
UNESCO Creative Cities Network(UCCN) was established in 2004 and now 246 cities in 70 countries worldwide joined the network. Several Korean cities, such as Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, Icheon, Jeonju, Tongyoung, Bucheon, Wonju, Jinju are members of the network. This paper aims to suggest urban cultural policy directions through analyzing the missions of the UCCN and new agenda raised at the UCCN annual meetings, steering groups, and coordination committee. At the outset the main aims of the UCCN were the promotion of cultural industries, local employment growth, and tourism development, which were mainly focused on aggregated industrial growth. Gradually, UNESCO has changed its goals and missions and proposed new agenda as follows: sustainable human and urban society according to SDG 11, arts for socio-spatial disadvantaged, and human empowerment. The paper discussed the importance of weak tie in urban cultural policies, inclusive strategies based on collaborative governance, building creative cities not by neo-liberal competitive policies but by civility, inclusivity, and enbeddedness. All in all, it suggested collective learning (not education), community development (not indivisual competition), residents as subject (not policy object), and finally the importance of recognition of cultural resources and contemporary cultural interactions as local commons.
Keywords
UNESCO Creative Cities Network (UCCN)
SDG 11
weak tie
inclusive city
governance
commons
유네스코 창의도시 네트워크(UCCN)는 2004년 결성되어 현재 70개국 이상의 246개 도시가 가입되어있으며, 우리나라는 서울, 부산, 대구, 광주, 이천, 전주, 통영, 부천, 원주, 진주 등 10개 도시가 회원도시로 활동하고 있다. 이 논문은 UCCN의 지향점에 대한 논의와 최근 연례회의에서 제시된 어젠다 분석을 통해서 창의도시정책의 방향을 제시하고, 우리나라 도시의 문화정책이 가지는 문제점과 변회의 방향을 제시하고자 한다. UCCN은 창립 초기의 지향점인 문화산업 진흥, 투자와 고용의 기회창출, 문화관광의 확충 등의 산업적인 측면을 강조에서 벗어나, 지속적인 회의와 어젠다수립을 통해 시민의 문화예술역량 강화와 문화경제의 활성화를 통한 지속가능한 발전, 사회적 약자와 소외된 공간의 참여증대 등의 포용적 의제를 강조한다. 이 논문에서는 SDG 11을 중심으로 도시의 지속가능성 의미와 함께 소위 창조도시 담론이 도시 문화정책에 미치는 부정적인 영향을 비판하고, 약한 사회적 연계를 지향하는 문화정책, 협력적 거버넌스 구축을 통한 포용도시정책, 인간개발, 배태성, 시민성, 자유와 자율에 기반한 창의도시의 정책과 프로그램의 기획과 구성을 제안한다. 주민의 역량강화가 교육이 아닌 학습으로, 개인에서 공동체로, 주민이 대상에서 주체로 변화하여야 하며, 로마헌장과 시대정신을 반영하여 문화자산과 지역문화를 공유재로 인식하여야 한다.
키워드
유네스코 창의도시 네트워크(UCCN)
SDG 11
약한 연계
포용도시
거버넌스
공유재
References
  1. 남기범, 「창조도시 논의의 비판적 성찰과 과제」, 『도시인문학연구』, 제6권(제1호), 2014.
  2. 남기범, 「보통도시로서 포용도시 논의와 서울의 과제」, 『대한지리학회지』, 제53권(제4호), 2018.
  3. 서울대학교 사회발전연구소, 『포용적 국가균형발전을 위한 삶의 질 역량격차 조사 및 정책방안 연구』, 서울시, 2020.
  4. 양혜원, 『문화영향평가 표준평가도구 개발 연구』, 한국문화관광연구원, 2017.
  5. 에릭 클라이넨버그 저, (Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life), 서종민 역, 『도시는 어떻게 삶을 바꾸는가: 불평등과 고립을 넘어서는 연결망의 힘』, 웅진지식하우스, 2019.
  6. 이병민, 「창조경제시대 창조적 환경과 지역발전의 의미: 창조도시를 중심으로」, 『문화콘텐츠연구』, 제3호, 2013.
  7. 장세룡, 『미셸 드 세르토: 일상생활의 창조』, 커뮤니케이션북스, 2016.
  8. 한국문화관광연구원, 『2019년 문화영향평가 종합결과보고서』, 한국문화관광연구원, 2019.
  9. Alves, P., "Strategies for sustainable development of the UNESCO Creative cities," Paper presented at ACTAS ICONO14 - VI Congreso Internacional Ciudades Creativas, 24 y 25 de Enero de 2018. Orlando, Florida, 2017.
  10. Cudnya, W., et al., "Arts and creativity: A business and branding strategy for Lodz as a neoliberal city," Cities, 100, doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102659, 2020. 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102659
  11. Douglass, M., "Transformations in the governance of urban and regional planning in Korea: From (neo-)developmentalism to civic democracy, 1965-2020," in Park, Se Hoon, et al, eds., Exporting Urban Korea?: Reconsidering the Korean Urban Development Experience, London: Routledge, 2021. 10.4324/9781003047599-3
  12. Gathen, C., Skoglund, W., and Laven, D., "The UNESCO Creative Cities Network: A Case Study of City Branding," in Calabrò, F., Spina, L., and Bevilacqua, C., eds., New Metropolitan Perspectives, Springer, 2021. 10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_68
  13. Gu, X. et al., eds., Re-imagining Creative Cities in Twenty-First Century, Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 10.1007/978-3-030-46291-8
  14. Gore, C. "Irreducible social goods and the informational basis of Amartya Sen's capability approach." Journal of International Development 9(2), Wiley, 1997. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199703)9:2<235::AID-JID436>3.0.CO;2-J
  15. Granovetter, M., "The strength of weak ties," The American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1973. 10.1086/225469
  16. ICCF, Pokok Pembahasan Workshop: Indonesia Creative Cities Conference V, Indonesian Creative Cities Network, 2019.
  17. Kong, L. and O'Connor, J., eds., Creative Economies, Creative Cities: Asian-European Perspectives, London: Springer, 2009.
  18. Landry, C. and Bianchini, F., The Creative City, London: Demos, 1995.
  19. Laven, D. and Skoglund, W., eds., Valuing and Evaluating Creativity for Sustainable Regional Development, UNESCO, 2016
  20. Markusen, A. and Gadwa, A., "Arts and culture in urban or regional planning: a review and research agenda," Journal of Planning Education and Research 29(3), Sage, 2010. 10.1177/0739456X09354380
  21. Matovic, M. et al., Creative Cities: Mapping Creativity Driven Cities: 12 Good Practices from UNESCO Creative Cities Network, Deusto Cities Lab Katedra, 2018.
  22. Nussbaum, M., Women and Human Development: the Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  23. O'Connor, J., Gu, X., and Lim, M., "Creative cities, creative classes and the global modern," City, Culture and Society 21, Elsevier, 2020, doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2020.100344. 10.1016/j.ccs.2020.100344
  24. Peck, J., "Struggling with the creative class," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29(4), Wiley, 2005. 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x
  25. Pratt, A., "The cultural contradictions of the creative city," City, Culture and Society 2, Elsevier, 2011, pp.123-130. 10.1016/j.ccs.2011.08.002
  26. Sasaki, Masayuki "Case study window: Cultural cluster, capital and cityscape: The cultural economy of Japanese creative cities," in Young, G. and Stevenson, D., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning and Culture, Ashgate, 2013.
  27. Scott, A. and Storper, M., "The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39(1), Wiley, 2015. 10.1111/1468-2427.12134
  28. Stern, M.J., and Seifert, S.C., "Cultural clusters: the implications of cultural assets agglomeration for neighborhood revitalization," Journal of Planning Education and Research 29(3), Sage, 2010. 10.1177/0739456X09358555
  29. Stevenso, D., "Rethinking creative cities?: UNESCO, sustainability, and making urban cultures, in Gu, X. et al., eds., Re-imagining Creative Cities in Twenty-First Century, Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 10.1007/978-3-030-46291-8_5 PMC7281304
  30. Teschl, M. and Derobert, L., 2008. "Does identity matter? On the relevance of identity and interaction for capabilities," in Comim, F., Qizilbash, M. and Alkire, S., eds., The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures, and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  31. UCCN, UNESCO Creative Cities Network Annual Meeting, Östersund, Sweden, UNESCO, 2016.
  32. UCCN, UNESCO Creative Cities Network Annual Meeting, Enghien-les-Bains, UNESCO, 2017.
  33. UCCN, Conclusion of the XIIth Annual Conference of the UNESCO Creative Cities Network, Krakow, UNESCO, 2018.
  34. UCCN, Conclusion of the XIIIth Annual Conference of the UNESCO Creative Cities Network, Fabriano, UNESCO, 2019.
  35. UCCN, UNESCO designates 66 new Creative Cities, https://en.unesco. org/creative-cities/events/unesco-designates-66-new-creative-cities (검색일 2021년 2월 15일).
  36. UCCN, About us, http://en.unesco.org/creative-cities/content/about-us (검색일 2021년 2월 15일).
  37. UNESCO, Global Alliance for Cultural Diversity 2002, Fact Sheet: Fostering partnerships in the cultural industries for development. http:// www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/ agdc_factsheet_en.pdf (검색일 2021년 2월 15일).
  38. UNESCO, Networks of Creative Cities within the Global Alliance for Cultural Diversity. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf 0000136203 (검색일 2021년 2월 15일).
  39. UNESCO, Culture and Urban Future: Global Report on Culture for Sustainable Urban Development, UNESCO, 2016.
  40. UNESCO, Building a Collective Vision for the Future, UNESCO, 2017.
  41. UNESCO, UNESCO Creative Cities Programme for Sustainable Development, UNESCO, 2018a.
  42. UNESCO, Culture for the 2030 Agenda, UNESCO, 2018b.
  43. UNESCO, Culture 2030 Agenda: Thematic Indicators for Culture in the 2030 Agenda, 2019.
  44. UNESCO, UNESCO Creative Cities Network for Sustainable Development, UNESCO, 2020.
  45. UNESCO, Engineering for Sustainable Development, UNESCO and ICEE, 2021.
  46. United Nations, New Urban Agenda. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/ uploads/NUA-English.pdf, 2016.
  47. 로마헌장, https://www.2020romecharter.org
  48. 유네스코, https://en.unesco.org/creative-cities/home.
  49. 유네스코, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246291.
Information
  • Publisher :Research Institute of Creative Contents
  • Publisher(Ko) :글로컬문화전략연구소
  • Journal Title :The Journal of Culture Contents
  • Journal Title(Ko) :문화콘텐츠연구
  • Volume : 21
  • No :0
  • Pages :7-39
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.34227/tjocc.2021..21.7
Journal Informaiton The Journal of Culture Contents The Journal of Culture Contents
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close