The Journal of Culture Contents ISSN:2287-2256(Print) 2671-7026(Online) 문화콘텐츠연구

Since the implementation of a local self-governing system in 1995, literary museum, which are a form of literary places in Korea, have begun to be actively constructed. However, it is being constructed to commemorate the artist without worrying about the role of literature museum, or to raise local image. In other words, it is being built indiscreetly without considering the change of the visitor demand of the 21st century and the way of following the characteristic. Literature is a crystallization of a creature that expresses without change of the times, or a phenomenon of that age. In foreign, which has paid attention to these characteristics of literature, continues to engage in discussions to link literature with tourism since the 1970s. As a result, research on literary tourism, which means all forms of tourism related to the place of literature. Especially, as the paradigm of tourism changes, tourism such as alternative tourism and Special Interest Tourism(SIT) has become more diverse, and so 'literary tourism' is attracting attention. In addition, the classification of tourists has also been diversified, such as Choraster, but there is still a lack of discussion in Korea. Discussions on literary tourism are limited to tourism, and rather than focusing on the value of literature, they are attempting to link literature to the reporting industry simply as a tourism resource. Therefore, discussion about literature tourism should be done from a more diverse perspective. Therefore, this article summarizes the characteristics of literary tourism in which there are diverse tourists such as tourists who are interested in literary tourism and travelers who are determined to travel by chance, and tourists who have been accidentally discovered by their own choice, and discussed ways to activate the literary museum. The research method is as follows. After reviewing the definition of 'literary tourism', Smith proposed a framework of analysis through discussion of Smith 's discussion of four types of literary tourism and Herbert' s comparisons of conditions of general literary places and conditions of special literary places. And ‘Choi Myeong Hee Literary Museum' and 'Yoon Dong Ju Literary Museum', The results of the study are as follows. The planning of the Literary Museum should be viewed as a part of 'Literary Tourism' and should be activated together with the surrounding environment of the area and literature museum. Also, metaphorical expressions about the place of literature are needed. In addition, it is important to organize the exhibition space and the space to guide tourists to think and imagine themselves. In this regard, Yoon Dong Ju Literary Museum is organizing a space composition and exhibition to allow tourists to enter and immerse in the feelings that Yoon Dong Ju 's poetry had suffered during the Japanese colonial period. On the other hand, Choi Myeong Hee's Literature Museum had the elements that were raised as a problem of the domestic literature museum such as the disturbing composition from the entrance of the literary museum, the simple enumeration display, and the connection with the surrounding environment. In conclusion, in order to revitalize the domestic literature museum, it is necessary to look into literature museum as a part of literary tourism and deeply explore ways to revitalize it with the environment around the area and literature museum. In addition, it is necessary to construct a space and exhibition plan that will guide tourists to think and imagine themselves.